A revolution, 140 characters at a time

22/02/2011

Comments: 5 readers have left a comment

THE upheavals and protests in Iran in 2009, and in Tunisia, Egypt, Bahrain and Libya this year have been breathlessly reported by Western media as “Twitter” or “Facebook” revolutions.

Leaving aside the arrogance of claiming that popular upheavals in which hundreds, if not thousands of people have died, were the result of social networking websites, it is clear that Facebook and Twitter were, in some ways, used to organise protests.

The question becomes then, were the uprisings fomented and sustained by social networking sites in much the same way Gutenburg’s press sparked the Reformation.

The protests, which were originally sparked when Tunisian man Mohamed Bouaziziset set himself on fire because authorities refused to hear his complaints about his treatment by police who shut down his vegetable stall.

Bouazizi’s story spread throughout Tunisia on Facebook and Twitter and when he died from third degree burns 18 days later, protests erupted around the country.

Within a week the 23 year reign of President Zine el Abidine Ben Ali was over.

The spark, lit by Bouazizi and fanned by Twitter and Facebook, ignited a firestorm that threatened to engulf the region.

Egypt and Libya, in the face of protests, completely shutdown the internet

This seems to lend credence to the “Twitter revolution” theory.

And China, in the wake of the uprisings, has blocked searches for the word Jasmine on Twitter (the Middle East uprisings have been dubbed Jasmine Revolutions) indicating the Politburo is fearful of the microblogging site’s potential as an organising tool for dissidents.

It must be said, however that the temporary shutdown of the internet in Egypt and Libya did little to reduce the intensity of the protests once they had started.

It cannot be denied that the internet has played a role in the revolts across the Middle East, but credit for the popular uprisings does not belong to Mark Zuckerberg or Jack Dorsey.

It belongs to the millions of people who braved bullets, bombs and beating to demand their voices be heard.

Bookmark and Share

Reader Comments

peter

22/02/2011 at 20:18

Libyan protesters facing tanks an helicopter gunships, that's worth applauding

Zoe

23/02/2011 at 15:55

Oppressive government = revolution
Social media = easy mode of communication

Eliana

28/02/2011 at 10:19

I've been a huge advocate of twitter pretty much since the site spawned. In 2009 if it weren't for twitter, and other social media sites, the injuries and deaths of thousands of Iranian protesters would have gone unnoticed as traditional media organizations were shut out or shut down following the elections.

I honestly understand why people are using a catch phrase like "twitter revolution" or "facebook revolution" the regimes do not understand the power of these new social media networks for communication and organization and as such, find it hard to shut them down.
The truth of the matter is, many people in these countries are fueled not only by their passion for change, but also by the solidarity of millions of people worldwide who stand with them and keep spreading their message across the internet. I'm proud to have been one of those people. If someone as brave as Khaled Said's Mother isn't offended by the terminology, then I'm not either.

Post a comment

 

Monday 20 Oct 2014

  • Min 11°C
  • Max 21°C

Tuesday

  • 8 - 24°C

Wednesday

  • 14 - 29°C

Subscribe Page
HBF Junior Sports Heroes
Supporting the local community
email subscribe link
  CommunityPix banner link